Still Scared Stupid?
Monday, January 22, 2007

"In a video released Monday, al Qaeda's second in command ridicules President Bush's plan to send more U.S. troops to Iraq and predicts a fate "worse than anything you have yet seen." Al-Zawahiri cites Bush's plan to send more than 20,000 U.S. troops to Iraq, and asks, "Why not send 50,000 or 100,000?" FBI officials said Monday that U.S. forces found documents at least six months ago indicating al Qaeda in Iraq has aspirations to attack on U.S. soil." ~CNN

Hmmm...immanent threat. So like August 6, 2001 PDB immanent threat? Or Katrina Force Hurricane immanent threat? I'm not sure. And the President's not telling. This threat was discovered six months ago, and yet it's made public the day before his sixth State of the Union Address when his popularity is currently next to nil.

No one is taking George's calls. And he needs to send more troops to Iraq! Why? Something about it being the only way to win. Why they didn't slap a Mission Accomplished sign over a KFC/TGI Friday's/Nike sponsored globally televised execution of Saddam and start bringing troops home the next day, I will never know.

The policies to be set forth in the State of the Union Address are getting a vicious going over both in the international press, and here at home. Taxing our health benefits as income? This is a win for us how? Think, damn it! Your policies have failed. You're presiding over a red hot economy that doesn't know whether to implode or dominate the world, you're out-to-lunch playing at a fantasy with our dime and the lives our fellow citizens, and you want to tax health care as income?

I have no words.

Labels: , , , ,

Speed of lightning, roar of thunder
Sunday, September 03, 2006

It's a new strategy for the GOP: everyone loves the underdog. The party that currently holds sway over all three branches of our government will spend the next few weeks blaming the diminished returns of the American economy, the failed Road Map process in the Middle East, and the woeful state of American national security on their critics in a bid to fashion themselves as underdogs in the upcoming election. The President and his top advisers this past week framed critics of the administration - morally and intellectually confused adherents to the "blame America first" school of thought - as the chief cause of domestic and foreign policy failures.

In a stunning invocation of Godwin's Law, President Bush and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld equated those who oppose the administration's handling of the War on Terror with Nazi appeasers and Communists sympathizers. It was an attempt to portray to the public a well-meaning administration hamstrung in its efforts to fight the good fight not by sheer incompetence and hubris, but by feckless naysayers who just don't "get it."

For the first time in six years the GOP is approaching the American voter like a ne'er-do-well spouse asking for just one more chance to make things right. Without a single successful venture to point to in six years of power the GOP is blaming everyone but themselves for failures under their watch.

Will it work? Can the election spin machine turn a brash-talking cowboy president into a sympathetic Joe just trying to do right by his heart? It's already started. MSNBC's Joe Scarborough - a former GOP member of Congress - led off the first salvo with his "Is Bush an Idiot?"(video) piece a couple of weeks ago. The normally hawkish Scarborough caught some flack for the piece but it served its purpose. Those inclined to defend the President did, and the undecided in the crowd stopped thinking of President Bush as world's only nuclear armed six-gun slinger and started to wonder if maybe folks were being too hard on the guy. Phase one was complete.

Phase two came with the announcement that more GOP Congressional seats than previously believed are up for grabs in this year's midterm election. These members of Congress don't need to associate themselves with the president or his administration - that's a losing proposition - they only need to follow the President's lead and attack their morally and intellectually confused opponents who either don't get it, or simply don't take threats to American national security seriously.

Which leads me to phase three: seriously. Expect to see this buzzword, or at least the concept, in more frequent use. The electioneers know they have a major problem with satirists like Jon Stewart, Bill Maher, and Stephen Colbert(video). These commentators reach an audience of tens of millions of people showcasing the failures and ineptitude of the administration weekly. In the GOP underdog strategy, their impact will be marginalized by the notion that their dissent is a stumbling block to what might otherwise be successful GOP policies. Furthermore their criticisms will be wholly discounted not because they are without merit, but because they come from comedians out only for laughs. In short, these critics of the administration do not take the threats America faces seriously. The goal of this phase of the underdog strategy is to diminish, if not neutralize, the impact of any observations contrary to the GOP party line: stay the course, no matter what.

If you see the underdog strategy at work in your own state races post relevant links and your observations in the comments section below.

When criminals in this world appear,
And break the laws that they should fear,
And frighten all who see or hear,
The cry goes up both far and near for
Underdog,
Underdog,
Underdog,
Underdog!

Labels: , , , ,

The coming storm
Tuesday, July 11, 2006

Three years ago I began this blog with a question: what the hell is going on? I watched as the country I love and served veered to the right under the sway of Neo-Conservatism and its practitioner's policies of FUD. Dark times indeed, but I fear darker times are yet to come.

John Dean, former White House Council to President Richard M. Nixon, recently wrote a book called Conservatives Without Conscience. In it he discusses the traits of authoritarian personalities and those of the people who follow them. Mr. Dean, having served President Nixon during the Watergate Era has a unique perspective on this. He is deeply concerned that America is in danger of falling too far into the thrall of despotism(google video).

As a bat-shit crazy conspiracy geek I have my own unique perspective: Mr. Dean is dead wrong. The United States is in no danger of becoming a right-wing dictatorship. We're as close to that today as we will ever come. The good news is that America will avoid the anti-democratic police state of George W. Bush's blurry-eyed, God and freedom dream (Remember when he didn't “do the vision thing"? Good times). The bad news is that no one has told the fringe yet.

There are people in our nation today who strongly support the dogma of the New American Century. Come November, while Neo-Cons in Washington are packing up there desks, shedding paperwork, and planning their golden triangle moves out of policy and into industry or academia, the fringe will be seething.

For the past decade extremists in American have been placated. Those born to wave the flag have done so with impunity, reveling in daily displays of American military might. And here I'm not talking about flag-ribbon magnet SUV driving soccer moms from the suburbs. I mean the real wackos, of which there are many. These people love America, don't get me wrong, but they love our nation in an icky, unrequited way (see One Hour Photo). Under the right circumstances these Americans can be dangerous. Circumstances we are likely to experience over the next two years.

Should the Bush regime, and by extension the GOP, fall from grace with the general electorate, terroristic extremism not fascism will be the danger America faces. In his book Mr. Dean discusses the followers of authoritarian figures, and specifically how these individuals have a tendency to follow too strongly and for too long. What then will their reaction be once their politicians have been defeated at the polls? We've already experienced some of what we can expect.

In their child-like minds they will rationalize violence against their own "misguided" country. Bombings, assassinations, intimidation. In a word: terrorism.

Can it happen here?

Labels: , , ,

"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. When the loyal opposition dies, I think the soul of America dies with it."

RECENT LABELS

    MOST ACTIVE LABELS

      ALL LABELS